01
Fri, Jul
51 New Articles

Croatia: One Court Decision and its Impact on M&A Deals in Croatia

Croatia: One Court Decision and its Impact on M&A Deals in Croatia

Croatia
Tools
Typography
  • Smaller Small Medium Big Bigger
  • Default Helvetica Segoe Georgia Times

It has become evident by now that the 2020 global pandemic has reshaped many aspects of the legal industry, with one of the eminent examples being the way M&A transactions are carried out – almost everything has become less certain, more urgent, and largely virtual. As though the circumstances have not been challenging enough, recent developments in local jurisprudence concerning the form of legal documents have started to negatively impact M&A deals in Croatia.

M&A Deals in Croatia are Impacted by More Than Just COVID-19

Even though Croatia does not adhere to the common law system of precedent, court practice is more often than not invoked as legal authority. This is the reason why a recent decision by the Croatian High Commercial Court ruffled some feathers among legal practitioners. In its December 11, 2019 decision, the High Commercial Court rather mechanically applied the “parity of form” rule, which requires a power of attorney to be in the same form as a contract signed under it. The problem arising out of the High Commercial Court’s interpretation is that local law sometimes requires the use of legal forms that are almost exclusively unique to Croatia, so carrying out cross-border deals would get rather complicated should this one decision become standard practice.

The best example is an agreement for the transfer of shares in a Croatian limited liability company (the most-used corporate vehicles locally). Croatian law provides that the share transfer agreement must be authenticated as to content by a local notary public and thus it is made in a special notarial form (in Croatian, solemnizacija). Under the High Commercial Court’s interpretation, powers of attorney authorizing party proxies (including proxies of non-Croatian parties) to act on their behalf in connection with entry into a Croatian share transfer agreement would also have to be authenticated as to content in a special form by the notary public. Naturally, the issue here is that many countries are not familiar with this form of document authentication, and if the High Commercial Court’s interpretation turns into a standard, this would leave parties with the unfortunate alternative of traveling to Croatia to either grant power of attorney before a Croatian notary public or execute the relevant agreement themselves.

The Spillover Effect of the “Parity of Form” Decision

This formalistic interpretation of Croatian corporate and commercial laws has already led to a more cautious approach in cross-border M&A deals, with some parties preferring to (at least partially) close the deal in person in Croatia or having a power of attorney executed in countries familiar with Croatian type of document authentication (such as Austria or Germany), when this is an option. Needless to say, travel bans and general uncertainty have not helped. However, this shift should not be viewed as standard practice, as the decision of the High Commercial Court does not represent a binding rule of law in the Croatian legal system. Also, the Croatian Notary Public Act provides grounds for alternative thought on the issue, as it provides that a large number of documents requiring authentication as to content may be executed based on a power of attorney in which only a signature has been notarized, rather than with authenticated content. Seeing as a large number of countries are more familiar with the signature notarization, the provisions of the Notary Public Act could be used to oppose the application of a formalistic interpretation of law arising from the Court’s decision.

Cross-Border Deals Without Crossing the Border?

Even though Croatia is lovely to visit year-round, superfluous business trips during a global pandemic are generally frowned upon. With Croatian legislation slowly moving towards use of e-communication and virtual corporate tools, hope remains that the High Commercial Court’s decision on “parity of form” will not gain too much momentum in practice, and that a business-friendly approach will be taken to minimize the efforts and maximize the effects of cross-border M&A deals involving Croatian companies.

By Iva Basaric, Partner, and Ivona Vidovic, Associate, Babic & Partners

This Article was originally published in Issue 7.9 of the CEE Legal Matters Magazine. If you would like to receive a hard copy of the magazine, you can subscribe here.

Croatian Knowledge Partner

Čipčić-Bragadin Mesić & Associates is one of the leading law firms in Croatia that serve companies, credit & financial institutions and public entities. We have been recommended and recognized as the legal experts and service leaders by many leading international legal guides for more than 15 consecutive years. With roots dating from 1928. we now probably have more tradition, experience and market presence than almost any other law firm in Croatia. We work closely with the leading international law firms and consultants so we’re able to manage complex, cross-border projects and deals seamlessly and successfully. Around 85% of our clients are international enterprises doing business in Croatia. List of our clients include some of the world-renowned companies such as Amazon Europe Core, China Machinery Engineering Corporation, Tate & Lyle, Nafta a.s., Unilever Croatia, Unilever Hungary, Lenovo, Innoenergy CE, Flixmobility, Flixbus CEE South, Okoenergie Group, CTC Holding, Bunge Limited, Chipita, Rolls-Royce, Canvas Holidays, Vacalianselect, Redgate Software, Red gate Investment, Yahoo!, Aston Martin Lagonda, Domino Printing UK, Domino Printing Sciences, Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank, Barclays Bank, HSBC, State Street Bank, Citigroup Global Markets, Credit Suisse, Bank of America Merill Lynch, Standard Chartered, Och-Ziff Capital Management, Amundi Asset Management, Altima International, Red Arc Global Investments, SMBC Nikko Capital Partners, Royal Bank of Scotland, Morgan Stanley International, J.P. Morgan group, Allianz Global Investors, Schroders, Macquarie Bank, Digital Finance International, Winton Capital Management, Citibank, Invesco Asset Management Österreich, Croatian Pension Investment Company, Unicredit Bank AG etc. We enjoy learning about our clients’ businesses and want to understand them completely so we can provide the best possible and complete service.

All News about, and Legal Analysis by, Čipčić-Bragadin Mesić & Associates can be found here.

Firm's website: cipcic-bragadin.com

 

Our Latest Issue